RAHUL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

     CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14519 of 2026

Rahul Singh
                                                               .....Applicant(s)
                                    Versus
State of U.P.
                                                                   .....Opposite
                                                                         Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Chandra Prakash              Pandey,     Vinay
                                Bhushan Upadhyay
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 72
                 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and
perused the record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the
applicant on bail in Case Crime No.32 of 2026, under Sections 109(1),
351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S., Police Station- Chakiya, District- Chandauli,
during the pendency of the trial.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been
falsely implicated in the present case along with his father. It is further
contended that only a general role of assault has been given to the applicant.
There is no injury sustained by the injured, which may be considered to be
dangerous to life. Similarly situated co-accused Rana Singh, father of the
applicant, has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated
01.04.2026 passed in Bail Application No.11088 of 2026. The applicant has
no criminal antecedents and is in jail since 13.02.2026.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail and has contended that
grievous injuries have been inflicted upon the injured by the applicant. He,
however, does not dispute the fact that the case of the applicant is at par with
the co-accused Rana Singh, who has already been granted bail by this Court.
5. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the
parties.
6. A perusal of the entire material on record indicates that the injured was
examined in the Department of Radio-diagnosis & Imaging Institute of
Medical Sciences, B.H.U., Varanasi, and as per the X-ray report, no bony
injury was seen. The CT Scan examination, however, indicates a fracture in
the left orbito-frontal bone of the forehead, however, the specific head
injury, which has led to the fracture, has not been assigned to the applicant.
                                                                                                BAIL No. 14519 of 2026
                                                                      2

                                    Only a general role has been assigned to the applicant and the case of the
                                    applicant is at par with that of co-accued Rana Singh. The co-accused Rana
                                    Singh is stated to have a criminal history of twelve cases, whereas the
                                    applicant has no criminal antecedents.
                                    7. Taking into account the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also
                                    the fact that the applicant is in jail since 13.02.2026 and is no longer required
                                    for custodial interrogation as the charge sheet has already been submitted,
                                    and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it
                                    appropriate to grant bail to the applicant.
                                    8. Let the applicant - Rahul Singh, involved in the aforementioned crime be
                                    released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in
                                    the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the
                                    following conditions:
                                    i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.
                                    ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.
                                    iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses
                                    and co-operate in the trial.
                                    iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the
                                    trial Court, unless his personal appearance is exempted by the Court
                                    concerned.
                                    9. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Court below
                                    will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his/her bail.
                                    10. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of
                                    computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website
                                    of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the
                                    undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.
                                    11. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the
                                    concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure
                                    early release of the applicant.
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Kushal
                                                                                           (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KUSHAL AGRAWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad