Allahabad High Court
CHAMELI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P.
- Decided
Holding
The Court held that Chameli Devi is entitled to be released on bail.
Summary
Chameli Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by self‑immolation, was charged under Sections 85, 80(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant contended that she was falsely implicated, that there was no material showing cruelty or dowry demand prior to the death, and that the charge‑sheet had already been filed, removing the need for custodial interrogation. The State opposed bail but did not dispute the factual background. The Court, considering the lack of incriminating evidence, the applicant’s clean record, the principle of non‑custodial interrogation after filing of charge‑sheet, and the need to decongest prisons, relied on Supreme Court precedents (Kapil Wadhawan vs CBI, Maya Tiwari vs State of U.P., etc.) and granted bail with standard conditions. The order directed verification of identity, surety bonds, and electronic transmission of the bail order.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant, Chameli Devi, is entitled to bail despite being charged under multiple serious offences.
- Whether the material on record suffices to invoke the presumption of dowry death under the relevant statutes.
- Whether the filing of a charge‑sheet eliminates the necessity for custodial interrogation.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- dowry death presumption
- criminal procedure
- overcrowded prisons
- Section 480 BNSS
- charge‑sheet
- false implication
- mother‑in‑law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4072 of 2026
Chameli Devi
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prakhar Saran Srivastava, Ram Raj
Pandey, Shubham Pandey, Vineet
Kumar Sahu
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dinesh Kumar Rai, G.A., Sanjeev
Kumar Shukla
Court No. - 66
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Heard Sri Vineet Kumar Sahu, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri
Sanjeev Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the first informant, Sri
Ramkumar Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the
applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 258 of 2025, under Sections 85,
80(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) B.N.S & Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station
Chola, District Bulandshahar, during the pendency of the trial.
3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is
the mother-in-law of the deceased, who committed suicide by setting
herself on fire after a petty dispute over household issues and this fact is
substantiated from the information given by the family members of the
victim at the time of conducting postmortem. The applicant has been
falsely implicated merely being the mother-in-law of the deceased, though
there is no sufficient material against her to show that she harassed the
deceased for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry prior to her death. The
applicant has been falsely implicated by making general and vague
allegations along with other family members. It is further submitted that
for invoking presumption of dowry death in case of death under unnatural
circumstances within seven years of marriage, there must be sufficient
material to show that the deceased was subjected to cruelty soon before
her death, but there is no such material.
BAIL No. 4072 of 2026
2
4. It is lastly submitted that charge-sheet has been filed by the police,
therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation. It is further
submitted that the applicant has no criminal history and being a lady, she
is entitled to be released on bail in view of Section 480 BNSS. The
applicant is a law abiding citizen and she is languishing in jail since
17.12.2025. In case, she is granted bail, she will not misuse the liberty of
bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.
5. Per contra, learned counsel for the first informant as well as learned
A.G.A. for the State have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but
could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions
of learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the fact that
applicant is the mother-in-law of the deceased and also keeping in view
the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and also taking
into account overcrowded jails and heavy pendency of criminal cases
before the trial courts as well as considering the mandate of the judgement
of the Apex Court in the case of Kapil Wadhawan vs Central Bureau of
Investigation reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 3038 as well as
guideline of this Court in the case of Maya Tiwari Vs. State of U.P.,
2024 SCC Online All 6765 regarding grant of bail and without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that
the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the present
application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant-Chameli Devi, involved in the aforementioned crime
be released on bail, on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties
each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with
the following conditions:-
i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police
officer or tamper with the evidence.
ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without
seeking any adjournment.
BAIL No. 4072 of 2026
3
iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission
of any crime after being released on bail.
iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the
bond executed by her.
8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for
cancellation of bail.
9. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be
verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
10. Verification of mobile number and Aadhaar card of the applicant as
well as sureties should be verified by the court concerned.
11. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of
computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official
website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel
with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.
12. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to
the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to
ensure early release of the applicant.
13. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through
Jail Superintendent, Bulandshahar via e-mail or on e-prison portal and
Trial Court via e-mode within 24 hours in compliance of the order of the
Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo
Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported
in (2024) 10 SCC 685 as well as Pila Pahan@Peela Pahan and others
Vs. State of Jharkhand and another, in Writ Petition (Criminal) No.
169 of 2025, decided on 29.05.2026.
14. Application, if any, stands disposed of.
(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)
September 30, 2026
SA
Digitally signed by :-
SALMAN ALI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…