Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

TUSHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

Decided

Holding

The bail application is allowed subject to a personal bond, sureties and conditions.

Summary

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tushar, accused in Crime No. 204 of 2025 under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, citing an acute medical ailment, lack of incriminating material, and alleged false recovery of a knife, while asserting no credible evidence against him. The State opposed the bail but could not refute the applicant's factual contentions. The Court, after weighing the seriousness of the charges, the prima facie case, and the risk of evidence tampering, decided to grant bail with a personal bond, sureties, and strict conditions. The order directed the applicant to appear regularly, refrain from tampering with evidence or witnesses, and not engage in any criminal activity.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused despite the seriousness of the charges under the B.N.S. and Arms Act
  • Whether there is a risk of flight, evidence tampering, or intimidation of witnesses that warrants denial of bail

Legislation cited

  • Arms Act — s. 25, 4
  • B.N.S. — s. 109(1), 115(2), 131, 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3)

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • evidence
  • flight risk
  • medical condition
  • Arms Act
  • B.N.S.
  • court conditions

Judgment

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
         CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4984 of 2026

Tushar
                                                             .....Applicant(s)
                                   Versus

State of U.P.
                                                                 .....Opposite
                                                                       Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)                           :   Rajesh Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                      :   G.A.

Court No. - 68
                 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Vijendra Kumar, learned AGA
for the State-Respondent and perused the record.

This bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant seeking
enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 204 of 2025, under Sections 191(2),
191(3), 190, 131, 109(1), 115(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 4/25 of
Arms Act, Police Station Purkaji, District Muzaffar Nagar.

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is
innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case crime number. He
submits that the applicant is suffering from some acute ailment and his
treatment is going on as such he cannot be involved in the aforesaid crime
due to deteriorating medical issue. Learned counsel for the applicant further
submits that the applicant had gone to the spot to pacify the quarrel going on
between the parties but due to ulterior motive he was implicated in the
present case. He submits that no incriminating material has been recovered
from the possession of the applicant but the police has shown the false
recover of one knife from the possession of the applicant. He submits that
there is no independent witness of the alleged incident. He submits that the
Investigating Officer has not collected any credible evidence against the
applicant. He submits that the applicant has been assigned the role of
exhortation. He submits that the main role has been assigned to another
accused. The applicant is languishing in jail since 08.11.2025. He submits
that the applicant has criminal antecedent of one another case to his credit
                                                                                                  BAIL No. 4984 of 2026
                                                                      2


                                    which has been explained in the affidavit filed in support of the bail
                                    application. He submits that there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course
                                    of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, the
                                    bail has been prayed for.

                                    Learned counsel for the AGA has vehemently opposed, but could not dispute
                                    the aforesaid fact raised by learned counsel for the applicant.

                                    Considering all those facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations,
                                    severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting
                                    evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima-
                                    facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made
                                    out.

                                    Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

                                    Let the accused-applicant, Tushar, involved in above mentioned case crime
                                    number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two
                                    reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court
                                    concerned, subject to the following conditions:

                                    1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

                                    2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

                                    3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and
                                    co-operate in the trial.

                                    4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the
                                    trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by
                                    the court concerned.

                                    In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below
                                    will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.

                                    March 18, 2026
                                    pks

                                                                                          (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
PAWAN KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.