Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ROHIT SAINIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME, LUCKNOW

Decided

Holding

The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh application for the altered charges.

Summary

Rohit Saini filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the application, the charge against him was altered to Sections 105 and 190 of the Indian Penal Code (BNS). Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the pending bail application and to file a fresh application in respect of the newly altered charges. The Court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal of the bail application. It also granted the applicant liberty to move a fresh bail application before the appropriate court concerning the altered charges.

Issues considered

  • Whether a bail application pending before the High Court can be withdrawn upon alteration of the charge.
  • Whether the applicant may be granted liberty to file a fresh bail application in respect of the new charges.

Subjects

  • bail
  • charge alteration
  • withdrawal of application
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 105 IPC
  • Section 190 IPC
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                  CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7136 of 2026

                                    Rohit Saini
                                                                                              .....Applicant(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh Through Principal Secretary
                                    Home, Lucknow                                                .....Opposite
                                                                                                       Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Adarsh Srivastava, Akhilesh Kumar
                                                                    Tiwari, Reena Pal, Santosh Kumar
                                                                    Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 71
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

                                    1. Learned Counsel for the applicant has stated that the charge has now
                                    been altered to one under Sections 105/190 BNS. As such, he states that
                                    he may be permitted to withdraw this application with the liberty of
                                    moving a fresh application before the appropriate Court in the newly
                                    altered charges.

                                    2. This application is dismissed as withdrawn with the above mentioned
                                    liberty.



                                                                                     (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Prashant D.




Digitally signed by :-
PRASHANT DWIVEDI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.