Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MURALI DHAR TIWARIversusKAILASH NATH TIWARI AND 25 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The revision petition is not maintainable and is dismissed.

Summary

The petitioners, Murali Dhar Tiwari and others, filed a civil revision before the Allahabad High Court challenging a lower court order. The revision was presented by counsel Dheeraj Kumar Pandey and Lakshmi Kant Pandey, while the respondents were represented by Ashutosh Mani Tripathi. The court examined whether the revision petition was maintainable under the applicable procedural law. It held that the revision was not maintainable and therefore dismissed the petition. The court ordered the certified copy of the documents to be returned to the petitioner's counsel after retaining a photostat copy on record.

Issues considered

  • Whether the civil revision petition filed by the petitioners is maintainable before the High Court

Subjects

  • revision
  • maintainability
  • civil procedure
  • High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                CIVIL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 50 of 2024

                                    Murali Dhar Tiwari
                                                                                               .....Revisionist(s)
                                                                      Versus
                                    Kailash Nath Tiwari And 25 Others
                                                                                                    .....Opposite
                                                                                                          Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Revisionist(s)    : Dheeraj Kumar Pandey, Lakshmi Kant
                                                                    Pandey
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ashutosh Mani Tripathi

                                    Court No. - 54
                                                         HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.

                                    1. Sri Sandeep Kumar Pandey, holding brief for Sri Lakshmi Kant Pandey,
                                    learned counsel for the revisionist, and Sri Ashutosh Mani Tripathi, learned
                                    counsel for the respondents, are present.

                                    2. The instant revision is not maintainable before this Court. Accordingly,
                                    the same is dismissed as not maintainable.

                                    3. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to the learned
                                    counsel for the revisionsit, after retaining photostat copy of the same on
                                    record.

                                    September 11, 2026
                                    Ujjawal
                                                                                            (Anil Kumar-X,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
UJJAWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.