Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ADDYA PRASAD PANDEY and ORS. IN CONS 25/1982versusCHANDRA SHEKHAR DIED ISSUELESS and ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed on merits/Rejected

Holding

The review petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Addya Prasad Pandey and others, filed a civil miscellaneous review application (No. 184 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was filed in 2021 but the hearing took place on December 1, 2025. No counsel or party appeared on the day of hearing, and no engagement, adjournment, or out‑of‑station slip was filed. The court noted that the order under review had been passed in the presence of counsel named in a prior order dated 25 November 2025. Because the petitioners failed to appear and prosecute the review, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and consigned it to the records.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a review petition is filed but the petitioners fail to appear and prosecute the matter?

Subjects

  • review petition
  • procedural default
  • want of prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                               CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 184 of 2021

                                     Addya Prasad Pandey And Ors. In Cons 25/1982
                                                                                               .....Applicant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                     Chandra Shekhar Died Issueless And Ors.
                                                                                                  .....Opposite
                                                                                                        Party(s)

                                     Counsel for Applicant(s)      : Satish Kumar Misra, Gyanendra Kumar
                                                                     Mishra, Ramesh Kumar Mishra
                                     Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

                                    Court No. - 6
                                                       HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.

                                    None appears for the review-petitioners to press the present review
                                    petition which is of the year 2021.

                                    Neither there is any engagement slip, adjournment slip or out of station
                                    has been sent.

                                    None appears for the review-petitioners despite noticing that the order
                                    was passed in presence of the counsel indicated in the order dated 25th
                                    November, 2025.

                                    In view of the aforesaid, the present review-petition is dismissed for want
                                    of prosecution. Consigned to records.



                                                                                           (Jaspreet Singh,J.)
                                    December 1, 2025
                                    Asheesh




Digitally signed by :-
ASHEESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.