Allahabad High Court
JAMILUDDIN @ JAMEEL AHMAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The Court held that the writ petition must be dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Petitioners Jamiluddin @ Jameel Ahmad and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of non‑prosecution by the petitioners. Consequently, any interim order that had been passed earlier was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution by the petitioners
Subjects
- writ petition
- non prosecution
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15918 of 2023
Jamiluddin @ Jameel Ahmad And 2 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Roy Sharma
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Manu Pathak, Mohit Kumar
Tiwari
Court No. - 49
HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call. Name of counsels for the
petitioner is shown in the cause list. None appears on behalf of
the petitioner to press the writ petition. Learned AGA for the
State is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order if any stands vacated.
(Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
September 23, 2026
Vandit
Digitally signed by :-
VANDIT AGRAWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…