Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AASAMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner shall not be arrested until cognizance of the charge sheet is taken by the trial court.

Summary

A writ petition (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 165 of 2023) was filed by Aasama seeking relief against potential arrest. The State of U.P. and three others responded that a charge sheet had been filed, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The petitioners did not appear before the High Court. The Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and, given the uncertainty about cognizance, directed that the petitioners shall not be arrested until cognizance is taken by the concerned court. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action regarding the arrest of the petitioner before the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • interim order
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                  CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 165 of 2023

                                    Aasama
                                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                               Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                            :    Devesh Vikram
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                            :    G.A., Pushpraj Yadav

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                          HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                          HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
                                    1. Case called out in revised list. None responds on behalf of the petitioner.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge sheet has
                                    already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he is not certain
                                    whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or not.


                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position regarding
                                    the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact there is interim order
                                    operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed of directing that till the cognizance
                                    is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not
                                    be arrested.


                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Abhishek
                                                                                (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.