Allahabad High Court
SMT. CHANDNI AND AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed because the petitioners failed to prosecute the petition.
Summary
Petitioners Smt. Chandni and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. The interim order that had been in force was vacated.
Subjects
- writ petition
- non prosecution
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20289 of 2023
Smt. Chandni And And 6 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Babu Lal Ram, Santosh Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Praveen Kumar Singh,
Riyajuddin Ansari
Court No. - 49
HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call. Name of counsel for the
petitioners is shown in the cause list. None appears on behalf of
the petitioners to press the writ petition. Learned AGA for the
State is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order if any stands vacated.
(Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
September 23, 2026
Virendra
Digitally signed by :-
VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…