Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SURESH DIXIT AND 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed because no party appeared to argue and mediation had failed.

Summary

A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 20613 of 2025) was filed by Suresh Dixit and eleven others against the State of U.P. and three others. The petitioners sought relief, and mediation between the parties was attempted but failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The Court observed the absence of representation and the failure of mediation. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition.

Subjects

  • mediation
  • petition dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20613 of 2025

                                    Suresh Dixit And 11 Others
                                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                              Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                                  :     Anwar Hussain
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                                  :     G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                          HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.

                                                          HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.


                                    1. Sri Anwar Hussain, learned counsel for petitioner is present.

                                    2. It appears that mediation has failed between the parties.

                                    3. None appears on behalf of the either of the parties to press this petition.

                                    4. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

                                    May 18, 2026
                                    Abhishek
                                                                               (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.