Allahabad High Court
AMIT MAURYA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed due to the non‑appearance of counsel for both parties.
Summary
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and, consequently, dismissed the petition. No substantive merits of the petition were addressed. The dismissal was based solely on procedural non‑appearance.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural course when no counsel appears to argue a writ petition?
Subjects
- mediation failure
- non‑appearance
- writ petition
- procedural dismissal
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21715 of 2025
Amit Maurya And 4 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sahibe Alam
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Pradeep Yadav
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. It appears that mediation has failed between the parties.
2. None appears on behalf of the either of the parties to press this petition.
3. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
April 23, 2026
Atul K. Sri.
Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…