Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ANURAG PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that until cognizance of the charge sheet is taken, the petitioner shall not be arrested.

Summary

The petitioner, Anurag Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and, to avoid premature arrest, directed that the petitioner not be arrested until cognizance is formally taken by the concerned court. The court disposed of the writ petition after issuing this direction. No substantive merits of the underlying criminal case were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can issue an order restraining arrest of the petitioner pending cognizance of the charge sheet by the trial court

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • interim relief
  • writ petition
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21724 of 2025

                                    Anurag Pandey
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Amit Kumar Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : G.A., Manvendra Narain             Pathak,
                                                                       Yogesh Pratap Singh

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                       HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                       HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge
                                    sheet has already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he
                                    is not certain whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or
                                    not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position
                                    regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact
                                    there is interim order operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed
                                    of directing that till the cognizance is taken on the police report by the
                                    court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.




                                                                     (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    April 23, 2026
                                    Atul K. Sri.




Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.