Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT SHIFA SALMANIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

Smt Shifa Salmani filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21857 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and eight others. The petitioner’s counsel was absent and no interim relief had been sought or granted. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. Consequently, the judges held that the petition could not be entertained further. The petition was therefore dismissed as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be entertained when it has become infructuous due to lapse of time

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • criminal
  • infructuous
  • lapse of time
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21857 of 2025

                                    Smt Shifa Salmani
                                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                             Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 8 Others
                                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                 :     Anubhav Kumar Vats, Ashish Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                 :     G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                             HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                             HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case is called out.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.

                                    3. There was no interim order passed in this case.

                                    4. The petition appears to have infructuous by eflux of time, it, is accordingly
                                    dismissed as infructuous.

                                    April 23, 2026
                                    Abhishek
                                                                                  (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.