Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MOHD. SALIM ALIAS LALUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petitioner shall not be arrested until cognizance of the police report is taken by the court.

Summary

Mohd. Salim alias Lalu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the prospect of his arrest in a case where a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, indicated that while the charge sheet was submitted, it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim order in the petition, directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested until cognizance of the police report is taken by the concerned court. The court emphasized that the protection against arrest is contingent upon the formal taking of cognizance. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner can be arrested before the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet
  • Whether the interim order in the writ petition can stay the arrest pending cognizance

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • interim relief
  • writ petition
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21864 of 2025

                                    Mohd. Salim Alias Lalu
                                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                               Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                            :     Mohammad Waseem
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                            :     G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                          HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                          HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge sheet has
                                    already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he is not certain
                                    whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position regarding
                                    the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact there is interim order
                                    operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed of directing that till the cognizance
                                    is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not
                                    be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.

                                    April 23, 2026
                                    Abhishek
                                                                                (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.