Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SEEMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed due to lack of representation and failed mediation.

Summary

The petitioner, Seema, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21875 of 2025) against the State of U.P. and three others. The parties attempted mediation, which ultimately failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioner or the respondents to argue the petition. The Court noted the absence of representation and the failure of mediation. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be entertained in the absence of any party's counsel after failed mediation

Subjects

  • mediation
  • writ petition
  • petition dismissal
  • court procedure
  • representation

Judgment

                                                     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21875 of 2025

                                    Seema
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                 :    Ranjit Singh, Vivek Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                 :    G.A., Ranveer Singh

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                         HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                         HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. It appears that mediation has failed between the parties.

                                    2. None appears on behalf of the either of the parties to press this petition.

                                    3. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.


                                                                       (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    April 23, 2026
                                    Ruchi Agrahari




Digitally signed by :-
RUCHI AGRAHARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.