Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ABHISHEK TYAGI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The High Court held that until cognizance of the charge sheet is taken, the petitioners shall not be arrested.

Summary

The petitioners, Abhishek Tyagi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, and the State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and, to avoid premature detention, directed that the petitioners not be arrested until cognizance of the police report is taken by the concerned court. The court emphasized that the pending status of cognizance was the controlling factor for the interim relief. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of after issuing the non‑arrest direction. The order was pronounced by Judges Siddharth and Vinai Kumar Dwivedi on 23 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can direct that petitioners not be arrested pending the taking of cognizance of the charge sheet by the trial court

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • writ petition
  • interim relief
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22088 of 2025

                                    Abhishek Tyagi And Another
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :   Suhail Bhardwaj
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                         HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                         HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case is called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge
                                    sheet has already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he
                                    is not certain whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or
                                    not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position
                                    regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact
                                    there is interim order operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed
                                    of directing that till the cognizance is taken on the police report by the
                                    court concerned, the petitioners shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.



                                                                       (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    April 23, 2026
                                    Ruchi Agrahari




Digitally signed by :-
RUCHI AGRAHARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.