Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SACHIN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that the petitioner shall not be arrested until cognizance of the police report is taken by the concerned court.

Summary

Sachin Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. No counsel appeared for the petitioner, while the State's Additional Advocate General informed that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and, to avoid premature arrest, directed that the petitioner could not be arrested until cognizance of the police report is taken by the concerned court. The petition was thereafter disposed of. The order effectively preserves the petitioner's liberty pending procedural clarification.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner can be arrested before the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet filed against him.

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • interim relief
  • arrest
  • writ petition
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22098 of 2025

                                    Sachin Kumar
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Suneel Kumar Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   Anurag Upadhyay, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                         HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                         HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case is called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge
                                    sheet has already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he
                                    is not certain whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or
                                    not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position
                                    regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact
                                    there is interim order operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed
                                    of directing that till the cognizance is taken on the police report by the
                                    court concerned, the petitioner shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.



                                                                       (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    April 23, 2026
                                    Ruchi Agrahari




Digitally signed by :-
RUCHI AGRAHARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.