Allahabad High Court
ISHTIYAK AHMAD AND 5 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed due to the non-appearance of counsel for both parties.
Summary
The petitioners sought relief through a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and, consequently, dismissed the petition. The dismissal was based on procedural grounds rather than substantive merits. No further orders were made.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a writ petition is filed without any party appearing before the court?
Subjects
- mediation failure
- petition dismissal
- procedural default
- criminal miscellaneous writ
- court appearance
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22116 of 2024
Ishtiyak Ahmad And 5 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rakesh Kumar Verma, G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. It appears that mediation has failed between the
parties.
2. None appears on behalf of the either of the parties to
press this petition.
3. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
April 23, 2026
Atul K. Sri.
Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…