Allahabad High Court
RAMUGRE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The Court declined to quash the FIR and disposed of the writ petition, permitting the petitioners to seek other remedies such as anticipatory bail.
Summary
The petitioners, Ramugre and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quashing of the FIR registered against them. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners withdrew the request for quashing the FIR and instead asked the court to grant them leave to approach a competent court for anticipatory bail and other appropriate remedies. The Court declined to entertain the relief for quashing the FIR. It disposed of the writ petition, observing that the petitioners remain free to pursue other legal remedies as advised. No substantive discussion on the merits of the FIR or anticipatory bail was made.
Issues considered
- The court's jurisdiction to quash an FIR in a writ petition
- Whether the petitioners can be granted leave to seek anticipatory bail through the writ petition
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure Code
- FIR
- Quashment
- Anticipatory Bail
- Writ Petition
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22479 of 2026
Ramugre And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Piyush Patel, Pradeep Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 49
HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
After some arguments, Shri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for
the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not wish to press
the relief for quashing of the F.I.R. in the writ petition.
The relief sought for quashment of the F.I.R. is accordingly
declined.
Shri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners recasts
his relief and prays that the petitioners may be granted leave to
approach the competent court for anticipatory bail and for
seeking other appropriate remedies available with him under the
law.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the observation
that it is always open to the petitioners to avail such other
remedies as may be advised.
(Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
September 17, 2026
Karan
Digitally signed by :-
KARAN KUMAR RAO
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…