Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

YASEEN ANSARIversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Petitioner Yaseen Ansari filed Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3884 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, although the petitioner's counsel names were listed. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution and vacated any interim order that had been in force. The judgment was delivered by Judges Ajay Bhanot and Divesh Chandra Samant on 23 September 2026.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non prosecution
  • dismissal
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3884 of 2024

                                    Yaseen Ansari
                                                                                             .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of Up And 3 Others
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Ambuj    Kumar      Mishra,    Amit
                                                                      Kesharwani, Hasan Parvej, Om Prakash
                                                                      Pandey, Raj Kumar Yadav, Vijay
                                                                      Kumar Sharma, Vineet Kumar Sharma
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 49
                                                     HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.

                                    Matter is taken up in the revised call. Name of counsel for the
                                    petitioner is shown in the cause list. None appears on behalf of
                                    the petitioner to press the writ petition. Learned AGA for the
                                    State is present.

                                    The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

                                    Interim order if any stands vacated.


                                                                (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Virendra




Digitally signed by :-
VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.