Allahabad High Court
VIRENDRA SINGH AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition was dismissed as no counsel appeared for either party.
Summary
The petitioners sought relief in a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation for both sides. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition. The dismissal was recorded on May 7, 2026, by Judges Siddharth and Vinai Kumar Dwivedi.
Issues considered
- Whether a petition can be entertained or proceeded when no counsel appears for either party
Subjects
- mediation failure
- petition dismissal
- court procedure
- absence of counsel
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4886 of 2022
Virendra Singh And 6 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, Pankaj Kumar
Sharma
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. It appears that mediation has failed between the parties.
2. None appears on behalf of the either of the parties to press this petition.
3. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
May 7, 2026
Abhishek
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…