Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SARITA SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO AND OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Consigned to Record

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Sarita Saxena, filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petition was listed but no representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. The State was represented by its learned Additional Government Advocate. The Court observed that the petition could not be proceeded with in the absence of the petitioner’s representation and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order, if any, was discharged.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition can be entertained and proceeded in the absence of the petitioner’s representation

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous petition

Judgment

                                                       Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:80451-DB

                                         Court No. - 10

                                         Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5536 of
                                         2024
                                         Petitioner :- Sarita Saxena
                                         Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko And Others
                                         Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Mani Tripathi,P.R.S. Bajpai
                                         Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ankit Kumar
                                         Pandey,Hairdaya Narain Tiwari

                                         Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.
                                         Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.

                                         1. Case called out in the revised list.

                                         2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this
                                         petition.

                                         3. Learned A.G.A. is present for the State.

                                         4. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                         5. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.

                                         .

                                                       [Om Prakash Shukla,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.]

                                         Order Date :- 3.12.2024
                                         Sachin




Digitally signed by :-
SACHIN MEHROTRA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.