Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ATUL SAXENA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court held that until cognizance is taken on the police report, the petitioners shall not be arrested.

Summary

Petitioners Atul Saxena and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and, to avoid premature detention, directed that no arrest of the petitioners be made until cognizance is formally taken by the concerned court. The Court emphasized that the procedural requirement of taking cognizance must be satisfied before any arrest can be effected on the basis of the charge sheet. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of after issuing the protective direction. The order was signed by Judges Vinai Kumar Dwivedi and Siddharth on 6 May 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether cognizance of the charge sheet has been taken by the trial court
  • Whether the petitioners can be arrested before cognizance is taken

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • writ petition
  • interim order

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6538 of 2023

                                    Atul Saxena And 3 Others
                                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                               Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                                   :     Amit Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                                   :     G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                       HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                       HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
                                    1. Case called out in revised list.


                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge sheet has
                                    already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he is not certain
                                    whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or not.


                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position regarding
                                    the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact there is interim order
                                    operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed of directing that till the cognizance
                                    is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not
                                    be arrested.


                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.



                                                                          (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Aditya




Digitally signed by :-
ADITYA KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.