Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MOHAMMAD YUSUF AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petitioners shall not be arrested until the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet.

Summary

Petitioners Mohammad Yusuf and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and, to avoid premature arrest, directed that the petitioners not be arrested until cognizance is formally taken by the concerned court. No substantive merits of the criminal case were addressed, as the petition was limited to procedural protection. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed, with the interim protection remaining in force pending cognizance.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural step when a charge sheet is filed but cognizance by the trial court is uncertain?
  • Whether the petitioners can be arrested before the trial court takes cognizance of the police report?

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • writ petition
  • interim relief
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6589 of 2025

                                    Mohammad Yusuf And 2 Others
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :   Deenanath Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                     HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge
                                    sheet has already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he
                                    is not certain whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or
                                    not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position
                                    regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact
                                    there is interim order operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed
                                    of directing that till the cognizance is taken on the police report by the
                                    court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.



                                                                     (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Aditya




Digitally signed by :-
ADITYA KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.