Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MOHD. HAIDER AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court held that until cognizance of the police report is taken, the petitioners cannot be arrested.

Summary

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest pending the court's taking cognizance of a charge sheet that had been filed. The State, through the Additional Government Advocate, confirmed that the charge sheet was submitted but it was unclear whether cognizance had been taken. The Court noted the existence of an interim order in the petition and, to avoid any premature arrest, directed that the petitioners shall not be arrested until cognizance is formally taken on the police report. The Court then disposed of the writ petition. The order effectively maintains the status quo pending further proceedings on cognizance.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can issue a direction restraining arrest of petitioners until cognizance of the charge sheet is taken
  • Whether the interim order in the writ petition remains operative in the absence of a clear cognizance

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • writ petition
  • interim order
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6628 of 2023

                                    Mohd. Haider And 3 Others
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             : Sukrampal, Tikendra Pratap Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                     HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge
                                    sheet has already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he
                                    is not certain whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or
                                    not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position
                                    regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact
                                    there is interim order operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed
                                    of directing that till the cognizance is taken on the police report by the
                                    court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.



                                                                     (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Aditya




Digitally signed by :-
ADITYA KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.