Allahabad High Court
CONSTABLE AJAY KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed.
Summary
Constable Ajay Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 670 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioners sought relief, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents to argue the petition. The Court observed the absence of representation and the failure of mediation. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for lack of any party to press it.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be entertained in the absence of any counsel representing the parties
Subjects
- writ petition
- mediation
- dismissal
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 670 of 2025
Constable Ajay Kumar And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Chandra Yadav, Satyawan
Yadav, Surya Ditya Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Om Prakash, Shashank Kumar,
Vinod Kumar Yadav
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. It appears that mediation has failed between the parties.
2. None appears on behalf of the either of the parties to press this petition.
3. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
May 6, 2026
Aditya
Digitally signed by :-
ADITYA KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…