Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BHANU PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petitioner shall not be arrested until the trial court takes cognizance of the police report.

Summary

The petitioner, Bhanu Pratap Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that, pending clarification on cognizance, the interim order in the writ petition should continue to protect the petitioner from arrest. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner not be arrested until cognizance is taken on the police report. The writ petition was thereafter disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner can be arrested when a charge sheet is filed but cognizance by the trial court is uncertain

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • writ petition
  • interim relief

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6808 of 2023

                                    Bhanu Pratap Singh
                                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                               Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                           :   Rajeev Kumar Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                           :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                       HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                       HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
                                    1. Case called out in revised list.


                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge sheet has
                                    already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he is not certain
                                    whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or not.


                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position regarding
                                    the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact there is interim order
                                    operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed of directing that till the cognizance
                                    is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not
                                    be arrested.


                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.



                                                                          (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Aditya




Digitally signed by :-
ADITYA KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.