Allahabad High Court
PRAKASH TIWARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition was dismissed as infructuous because it had become stale due to the lapse of time.
Summary
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 6839 of 2023) was filed by Prakash Tiwari against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioner’s counsel, Alkshendra Nath Bajpai and Subedar Shukla, were not present before the court. No interim order had been passed in the matter. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- lapse of time
- petition dismissed
- High Court of Allahabad
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6839 of 2023
Prakash Tiwari
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alkshendra Nath Bajpai, Subedar
Shukla
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have become infructuous by efflux of time, it, is
accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
May 6, 2026
Aditya
Digitally signed by :-
ADITYA KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…