Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HARISH CHANDRA MAURYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that the petitioners shall not be arrested until cognizance of the police report is taken by the trial court.

Summary

The petitioners, Harish Chandra Maurya and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from potential arrest. The State, represented by Shailendra Kumar Upadhyay, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted that no interim order was operating in the petition and, to prevent premature arrest, directed that the petitioners not be arrested until cognizance is formally taken by the concerned court. No substantive merits of the case were addressed. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners can be arrested before the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet filed by the investigating officer.

Subjects

  • arrest
  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • writ petition
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6901 of 2022

                                    Harish Chandra Maurya And Another
                                                                                          .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                   Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                        .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)    : Ali Hasan, Istiyaq Ali, Rajendra Kumar
                                                                   Dubey, Santosh Kumar Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)    : G.A., Shailendra Kumar Upadhyay

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                     HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Shri Shailendra Kumar Upadhyay, is present in person.
                                    Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that
                                    charge sheet has already been filed in this case by the
                                    investigating officer, but he is not certain whether cognizance
                                    has been taken by the court thereon or not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct
                                    position regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping
                                    in view the fact there is no interim order operating in this writ
                                    petition, the same is disposed of directing that till the cognizance
                                    is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the
                                    petitioner/petitioners shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.


                                                                 (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    NSC




Digitally signed by :-
NARENDRA SINGH CHAUDHARY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.