Allahabad High Court
SAYED MURTAZA @ MUDASSIRversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7363 of 2024) was filed by Sayed Murtaza @ Mudassir against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The matter was taken up in the revised call before Judges Ajay Bhanot and Divesh Chandra Samant. Although counsel for the petitioner was listed in the cause list, no counsel appeared to argue the petition, while the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner’s counsel fails to appear
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
- criminal miscellaneous
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7363 of 2024
Sayed Murtaza @ Mudassir
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hina Shafiq, Rizwan Ahmad(Qureshi)
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 49
HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call. Name of counsel for the
petitioner is shown in the cause list. None appears on behalf of
the petitioner to press the writ petition. Learned AGA is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order if any stands vacated.
(Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
September 23, 2026
Dhananjai
Digitally signed by :-
DHANANJAI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…