Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HASNAIN AHMAD @ SAJAN AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed because the petitioners failed to appear and prosecute the writ.

Summary

A criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7365 of 2024) was filed by Hasnain Ahmad @ Sajan and others against the State of UP and others. The petition was listed in the revised call, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, although the learned Additional Government Advocate was present. The Court observed the lack of prosecution by the petitioners and dismissed the writ petition. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Judges Ajay Bhanot and Divesh Chandra Samant on 23 September 2026.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • non prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7365 of 2024

                                    Hasnain Ahmad @ Sajan And 4 Others
                                                                                             .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of Up And 3 Others
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Akhilesh Bharti,    Kamlesh     Prasad,
                                                                      Manoj Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 49
                                                     HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.

                                    Matter is taken up in the revised call. Name of counsel for the
                                    petitioner is shown in the cause list. None appears on behalf of
                                    the petitioner to press the writ petition. Learned AGA is present.
                                    The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
                                    Interim order if any stands vacated.


                                                                (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Dhananjai




Digitally signed by :-
DHANANJAI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.