Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SIYARAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

Arrest of the petitioners is prohibited until the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest after a charge sheet had been filed by the investigating officer. The State’s Advocate indicated that while the charge sheet was submitted, it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and directed that the petitioners could not be arrested until the concerned court formally takes cognizance of the police report. The court thereby ensured protection of the petitioners’ liberty pending judicial determination of the charge sheet. The writ petition was subsequently disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether an arrest can be effected before the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet filed under criminal procedure.

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • writ petition
  • interim order
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                    CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 753 of 2025

                                    Siyaram And 3 Others
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :   Radhey Shyam Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                       HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                       HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge
                                    sheet has already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he
                                    is not certain whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or
                                    not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position
                                    regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact
                                    there is interim order operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed
                                    of directing that till the cognizance is taken on the police report by the
                                    court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.




                                                                     (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Atul K. Sri.




Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.