Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAM BACHAN KUSHWAHA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petitioners shall not be arrested until cognizance of the police report is taken by the court.

Summary

Petitioners Ram Bachan Kushwaha and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim order in the writ petition, directed that the petitioners not be arrested until cognizance of the police report is taken by the concerned court. No further substantive hearing was conducted as no counsel appeared for the petitioners. The writ petition was consequently disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners can be arrested before the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet filed against them

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • writ petition
  • interim order
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7534 of 2023

                                    Ram Bachan Kushwaha And 2 Others
                                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                               Versus
                                    State Of U P And 3 Others
                                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :    Suresh Kumar Kushwaha, Vinod Kumar
                                                                               Singh Kushwaha
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :    A.K.Srivastava, Amit Kumar Pandey, G.A.,
                                                                               Satyam Pandey

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                         HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                         HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list. None responds on behalf of the petitioner.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge sheet has
                                    already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he is not certain
                                    whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position regarding
                                    the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact there is interim order
                                    operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed of directing that till the cognizance
                                    is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not
                                    be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Abhishek
                                                                                (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.