Allahabad High Court
GHANSHYAM DAS SHARMA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed due to the failure of mediation and the absence of counsel for both parties.
Summary
The petitioners, Ghanshyam Das Sharma and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. Consequently, the court found no basis to entertain the petition further. The judges, Siddharth and Vinai Kumar Dwivedi, ordered the dismissal of the petition. The judgment was signed on May 7, 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when mediation fails and no counsel appears to argue a criminal miscellaneous writ petition?
Subjects
- mediation
- writ petition
- dismissal
- procedural law
- criminal miscellaneous
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7639 of 2025
Ghanshyam Das Sharma And 4 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Kumar Jaiswal
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. It appears that mediation has failed between the parties.
2. None appears on behalf of the either of the parties to press this petition.
3. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
May 7, 2026
Rohit
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ROHIT DAS
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…