Allahabad High Court
RAM NIWAS @ BITUversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Ram Niwas @ Bitu filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7667 of 2024 against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The Court noted the absence of representation for the petitioner and dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated. The judgment was delivered by Judges Ajay Bhanot and Divesh Chandra Samant on September 23, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be proceeded with in the absence of the petitioner's counsel or representation
Subjects
- writ petition
- criminal miscellaneous
- non‑prosecution
- interim order vacated
- court dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7667 of 2024
Ram Niwas @ Bitu
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajeev Kumar Saxena
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 49
HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call. Name of counsels for the
petitioner is shown in the cause list. None appears on behalf of
the petitioner to press the writ petition. Learned AGA for the
State is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order if any stands vacated.
(Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
September 23, 2026
Vandit
Digitally signed by :-
VANDIT AGRAWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…