Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAM BABU AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that until cognizance is taken on the police report, the petitioners shall not be arrested and the writ petition is disposed.

Summary

Ram Babu and ten others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against arrest. The State's Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The Allahabad High Court, noting the uncertainty about cognizance and the existence of an interim order, directed that the petitioners not be arrested until cognizance is taken on the police report. The court then disposed of the writ petition. No further substantive orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can direct that petitioners not be arrested pending cognizance of the charge sheet
  • Whether the writ petition stands disposed after issuing the interim direction

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • writ petition
  • interim order
  • arrest
  • High Court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                            CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7671 of 2025

                                    Ram Babu And 10 Others
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :   Mukesh Kumar Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                     HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge sheet
                                    has already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he is not
                                    certain whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position
                                    regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact there
                                    is interim order operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed of
                                    directing that till the cognizance is taken on the police report by the court
                                    concerned, the petitioners shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Rohit
                                                                      (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ROHIT DAS
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.