Allahabad High Court
INDRAJEET KAUR AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Summary
Petitioners Indrajeet Kaur and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was called. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of non prosecution by the petitioners. Consequently, any interim order that had been granted was vacated.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a writ petition before the Court?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non prosecution
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
- criminal miscellaneous
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7683 of 2024
Indrajeet Kaur And 2 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Through Principal Secretary And 2
Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Dhar Dwivedi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amit Kumar Pandey, G.A., Karunesh
Narayan Tripathi, Rahul Yadav
Court No. - 49
HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call. Name of counsel for the
petitioner is shown in the cause list. None appears on behalf of
the petitioner to press the writ petition. Learned AGA for the
State is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order if any stands vacated.
(Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
September 23, 2026
Vandit
Digitally signed by :-
VANDIT AGRAWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…