Allahabad High Court
VINAY KUMARversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non prosecution and the interim order is vacated.
Summary
Vinay Kumar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7715 of 2024 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition sought relief through a writ proceeding. Counsel for the petitioner were listed as Ashwani Singh and Vineet Singh Parmar, but no counsel appeared to prosecute the petition. The court observed that the petition was not prosecuted and consequently dismissed it. The interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- non prosecution
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7715 of 2024
Vinay Kumar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashwani Singh, Vineet Singh Parmar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 49
HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call. Name of counsels for the
petitioner is shown in the cause list. None appears on behalf of
the petitioner to press the writ petition. Learned AGA for the
State is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order if any stands vacated.
(Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
September 23, 2026
Vandit
Digitally signed by :-
VANDIT AGRAWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…