Allahabad High Court
PRAVEEN TYAGI @ PRAVEEN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the lapse of time.
Summary
Petitioner Praveen Tyagi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7763 of 2023 against the State of U.P. and three others. The petitioner’s counsel, Sunil Kumar Dubey, was not present before the Court. No interim relief had been sought or granted. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time (eflux of time). Accordingly, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be entertained when there has been a substantial lapse of time without any interim order.
Subjects
- writ petition
- criminal
- lapse of time
- infructuous
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7763 of 2023
Praveen Tyagi @ Praveen Kumar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar Dubey
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amul Kumar Tyagi, G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have infructuous by eflux of time, it, is accordingly
dismissed as infructuous.
May 7, 2026
Abhishek
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…