Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

LALIT RAJPOOT AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of time.

Summary

In Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7779 of 2022, Lalit Rajpoot and four others filed a petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petitioner's counsel, Ajay Dubey, was not present before the bench. No interim relief had been granted in the proceedings. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time (eflux of time). Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • criminal
  • dismissal
  • infructuous
  • lapse of time

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7779 of 2022

                                    Lalit Rajpoot And 4 Others
                                                                                                        .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                             Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                      .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                                  :    Ajay Dubey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                                  :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                             HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                             HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case is called out.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.

                                    3. There was no interim order passed in this case.

                                    4. The petition appears to have infructuous by eflux of time, it, is accordingly
                                    dismissed as infructuous.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Abhishek
                                                                               (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.