Allahabad High Court
BADELALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition was dismissed as infructuous because it had become stale due to the passage of time.
Summary
The petitioner, Badelal, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 778 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four others. The petitioner's counsel was not present at the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the proceedings. The Court noted that the petition had become infructuous by the efflux of time. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Subjects
- petition dismissed
- infructuous
- lapse of time
- procedural law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 778 of 2025
Badelal
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Zunaid Khan, Pulkit, Pusp
Raj Singh, Rajesh Singh, Sanjeev
Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have become infructuous by efflux of time, it, is
accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
May 7, 2026
Atul K. Sri.
Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…