Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MAHESH KUMAR YADAV ALIAS MAHESHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

No arrest may be made against the petitioner until cognizance of the police report is taken by the trial court.

Summary

Mahesh Kumar Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh and two others were respondents. The petitioners' counsel were absent, while the State's counsel indicated that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance. The High Court, noting the pending cognizance, issued an interim direction that the petitioner could not be arrested until cognizance of the police report is taken by the concerned court. The writ petition was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether an arrest can be effected before the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet filed by the investigating officer.

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • writ petition
  • criminal procedure
  • interim relief

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7800 of 2023

                                    Mahesh Kumar Yadav Alias Mahesh
                                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                                Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)               :    Ramakant Tiwari, Umesh Chandra Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)               :    Bal Ram Bind, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                         HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                         HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list. None responds on behalf of the petitioner.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge sheet has
                                    already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he is not certain
                                    whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position regarding
                                    the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact there is interim order
                                    operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed of directing that till the cognizance
                                    is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not
                                    be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Abhishek
                                                                                 (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.