Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KALYAN SINGH AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 18 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that the petitioners shall not be arrested until cognizance of the charge sheet is taken by the concerned court.

Summary

Petitioners Kalyan Singh and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging their potential arrest. No respondent appeared, and the Attorney General for the State informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim order in the writ petition, directed that the petitioners could not be arrested until cognizance of the police report is taken by the concerned court. The petition was thereafter disposed of. The order essentially provides interim protection against arrest pending procedural clarification.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners can be arrested before the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet filed against them

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • writ petition
  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • interim relief
  • arrest
  • high court

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7806 of 2023

                                    Kalyan Singh And 8 Others
                                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                               Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 18 Others
                                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :    Mahipal Singh, Sr. Advocate
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                         HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                         HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list. None responds on behalf of the petitioner.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge sheet has
                                    already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he is not certain
                                    whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position regarding
                                    the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact there is interim order
                                    operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed of directing that till the cognizance
                                    is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not
                                    be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Abhishek
                                                                                (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.