Allahabad High Court
MANGU LAL VERMA AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7867 of 2023) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel was absent, and no interim order had been passed. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous. The judgment was delivered on 7 May 2026 by Justices Siddharth and Vinai Kumar Dwivedi.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition is infructuous due to the lapse of time
Subjects
- infructuous petition
- petition dismissed
- limitation
- criminal miscellaneous writ
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7867 of 2023
Mangu Lal Verma And 8 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rishikesh Kumar Maurya
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Jeet Bahadur Gautam, Pradip Kumar
Singh, Sandeep Kushwaha, Vinod Kumar
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have infructuous by eflux of time, it, is accordingly
dismissed as infructuous.
May 7, 2026
Abhishek
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…