Allahabad High Court
DHEERAJ @ BILLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioners, Dheeraj @ Billu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and three others seeking relief. The petitioner's counsel, Agnivesh and Pradyumn Kumar, were not present before the court. No interim order had been passed in the matter. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous because of the lapse of time. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition can be entertained despite the lapse of time rendering it infructuous
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- delay
- procedural default
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7881 of 2025
Dheeraj @ Billu
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Agnivesh, Pradyumn Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Jadu Nandan Yadav
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have become infructuous by efflux of time.
5. It is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
May 7, 2026
Ruchi Agrahari
Digitally signed by :-
RUCHI AGRAHARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…