Allahabad High Court
SAJIVAN VISHWAKARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition was dismissed as infructuous because it had become stale due to the passage of time.
Summary
The petitioners, Sajivan Vishwakarma and another, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 7892 of 2023 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioner's counsel, Sheetala Prasad Pandey, was not present during the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the matter. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- delay
- procedural lapse
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7892 of 2023
Sajivan Vishwakarma And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sheetala Prasad Pandey
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ram Naresh Singh
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have become infructuous by efflux of time, it, is
accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
(Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
May 7, 2026
Atul K. Sri.
Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…