Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. NAVITA SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that until cognizance is taken on the police report, the petitioner shall not be arrested.

Summary

Smt. Navita Srivastava filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the possibility of her arrest. The State of Uttar Pradesh submitted that a charge sheet had already been filed, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of it. The High Court noted the uncertainty regarding cognizance and, considering the interim order already in force, directed that the petitioner not be arrested until cognizance is formally taken on the police report. No further substantive hearing was conducted. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether cognizance of the charge sheet filed by the investigating officer has been taken by the trial court
  • Whether the petitioner can be arrested before cognizance is taken

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • charge sheet
  • cognizance
  • interim order
  • arrest
  • writ petition

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                    CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7893 of 2023

                                    Smt. Navita Srivastava
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : Amit Kumar Agrahari, Ashutosh
                                                                        Kumar Srivastava, Avanish Kumar
                                                                        Srivastava, Kushagra Srivastava, Manoj
                                                                        Srivastava, Saumya Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         : Anil Kumar Pathak, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                        HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                        HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge
                                    sheet has already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he
                                    is not certain whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or
                                    not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position
                                    regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact
                                    there is interim order operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed
                                    of directing that till the cognizance is taken on the police report by the
                                    court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.




                                                                     (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Atul K. Sri.




Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.