Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

TEJ PAL SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petitioners shall not be arrested until cognizance is taken on the police report by the concerned court.

Summary

Petitioners Tej Pal Singh and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief against prospective arrest. The State had filed a charge sheet, but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and, to prevent any premature detention, directed that the petitioners not be arrested until cognizance is formally taken by the concerned court. The Court emphasized that the procedural requirement of cognizance must be satisfied before any arrest can be effected. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of with the protective direction in place.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a charge sheet has been filed but cognizance by the trial court has not been established, specifically regarding the arrest of the petitioners?

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • interim order
  • writ petition
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8140 of 2023

                                    Tej Pal Singh And 4 Others
                                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                               Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                           :    Ajay Sengar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                           :    G.A., Ujjawal Satsangi

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                         HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                         HON'BLE VINAI KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list. None responds on behalf of the petitioner.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge sheet has
                                    already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he is not certain
                                    whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position regarding
                                    the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact there is interim order
                                    operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed of directing that till the cognizance
                                    is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not
                                    be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.

                                    May 7, 2026
                                    Abhishek
                                                                                (Vinai Kumar Dwivedi,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.