Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RITESH KUSHWAHA AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Ritesh Kushwaha and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 8318 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition sought relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The matter was taken up in the revised call, but no petitioner appeared before the Court despite counsel being listed. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. Consequently, any interim order that had been passed was vacated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to non‑appearance of petitioners

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non prosecution
  • dismissal
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                                      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                       CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8318 of 2024

                                    Ritesh Kushwaha And Another
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                   .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                 :     Ashish Pandey, Randhir Jain
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                 :     G.A.

                                    Court No. - 49
                                                         HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
                                                         HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.

                                    Matter is taken up in the revised call.

                                    None appears on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ
                                    petition. Names of counsel for the petitioners are shown in the
                                    cause list. Learned AGA for the State is present.

                                    The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

                                    Interim order if any stands vacated.


                                                                    (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.)
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Ashish Tripathi




Digitally signed by :-
ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.