Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HARSUKH PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME GOVT. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Consigned to Record

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Petitioner Harsukh Pal Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the Additional Chief Secretary for the State was present. The court noted the absence of the petitioner’s representation. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, was vacated.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • procedural default

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            LUCKNOW
                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 839 of 2024

                                     Harsukh Pal Singh
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy.
                                     Deptt. Of Home Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others   .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Suyesh Pradhan
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 10
                                                          HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
                                                          HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. No one is present on behalf of petitioner, whereas learned AGA is
                                    present on behalf of the State.

                                    3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of
                                    prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.




                                                                    (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.)
                                    October 16, 2025
                                    Ajit




Digitally signed by :-
AJIT KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.